Three experts wrote it three ways, and they don't agree. Five questions tell you which future you're betting on.
How to take part
The idea
Three people wrote three versions of the same job description: the diagnostic radiologist in 2035. Two are radiologists. One is a health-tech professional with 20+ years in medical imaging IT. The vantage points are different on purpose, because the future of this job is not only a clinical question. It is also an economic one.
One version is optimistic: the radiologist grows into an orchestrator of AI. One is the trade-off view, written from the medical imaging IT side: the clinical job gets better, but there will be fewer radiologists. One is pessimistic: the profession splits into tiers, from a scarce on-site elite to a large, low-paid remote audit workforce.
Answer five questions about what you believe will be true. We show you the version that matches your outlook. Then you can read all three and compare them side by side.
The test
Five questions. Pick the answer closest to what you expect. There are no right answers, only the future you find most likely.
The versions
Thanks — counted.
01 · Summary
By 2035, the radiologist's role has evolved from traditional worklist-based image reporting to that of a diagnostic orchestrator, leveraging AI as a co-pilot to augment image interpretation, integrate multimodal data, and turn complexity into clear, actionable insights for clinicians and patients.
A new generation of AI tools supports radiologists by enabling faster image acquisition and lower doses while maintaining high quality, enhancing image analysis through automated lesions detection, quantification, and characterization, and generating structured preliminary reports ready for review and validation, including patient-friendly summaries. These tools also provide prognostic and predictive insights based on multimodal data.
Radiologists remain the primary decision-makers, retaining full control over AI outputs and their use, and leading communication with both clinicians and patients. As automation expands in routine cases, their focus increasingly shifts toward complex diagnostics, edge cases, multidisciplinary decision-making, and interventional procedures.
As AI handles more of the routine read, the radiologist has an opportunity, and a responsibility, to become more visible: known by name to patients and referrers, not just as a signature on a report. The human touch becomes a differentiator, not a given.
02 · Responsibilities
03 · Required
04 · Preferred
05 · Environment
06 · Success
What "good" looks like.
07 · Benefits
08 · Equal opportunity
We are committed to equal opportunity principles. All qualified applicants will be considered for employment without regard to legally protected characteristics, in accordance with applicable laws in the country of employment.
01 · Summary
By 2035, the radiologist's role is still defined by clinical judgment. What has changed is the threshold for when that judgment is needed. AI manages the routine read across defined modalities and indications. What reaches the radiologist's desk is harder: rare presentations, multi-system complexity, studies where imaging and clinical context don't align, and cases where the cost of being wrong is highest.
The radiologist is the final clinical authority. Not the first reader on most studies, but the accountable one. That means carrying responsibility for AI outputs validated under their name alongside direct interpretation of the cases AI can't handle. Both are real functions. Neither is optional.
As routine reporting contracts, the consultative role expands. Radiologists in 2035 spend more time in clinical conversations, multidisciplinary meetings, and direct patient communication than their 2030 counterparts. The profession is more visible, more integrated, and more exposed to the consequences of getting it wrong.
The economics of imaging AI point toward more output per radiologist, which means fewer radiologists per department. The job described here is a better version of the 2030 role for the people who hold it. There will be fewer of them.
02 · Responsibilities
03 · Required
04 · Preferred
05 · Environment
06 · Success
What "good" looks like.
07 · Benefits
08 · Equal opportunity
We are committed to equal opportunity principles. All qualified applicants will be considered for employment without regard to legally protected characteristics, in accordance with applicable laws in the country of employment.
The structure
Christoph Agten's version does not describe a single role. It describes a profession that has split into tiers: a scarce, elite on-site subspecialist layer; a mid-tier hands-on procedural layer; and a large, low-paid remote workforce auditing the output of autonomous AI. The three job descriptions below are the three tiers.
Tier 1
Elite tier · 100% on-site · high-scarcity premium base salary
The Tier 1 Senior Subspecialist functions as the ultimate diagnostic adjudicator, clinical consultant, and legal signatory for the hospital's autonomous imaging pipelines. This role focuses exclusively on highly complex, ambiguous subspecialty "edge cases" (primarily advanced MRI and complex CT) that have been flagged by AI as borderline, rare, or high-risk. Tier 1 radiologists provide visible clinical authority in face-to-face multidisciplinary teams and hold ultimate responsibility for the governance of the entire departmental workflow.
Tier 2
Mid-tier · 100% on-site · market-standard fixed salary
The Clinical Radiology Specialist is the physical engine of the on-site department. Because AI cannot physically manipulate a needle or hold an ultrasound probe, this role focuses entirely on operator-dependent diagnostic imaging and minor image-guided interventions. Clinical Radiology Specialists manage the heavy daily volume of patient-facing clinical workflows, serving as the hands-on execution layer of the hospital, with complex diagnostic escalations routed to Tier 1.
Tier 3
High-supply tier · 100% remote teleradiology · low salary, just above resident level
The Radiology Auditor forms the massive, distributed human-in-the-loop safety net for the hospital enterprise. Operating entirely via remote teleradiology workstations, this workforce manages the continuous data streams produced by autonomous AI models. Because the global supply of radiologists drastically exceeds the number of elite on-site roles, this position is highly competitive yet commands a very low salary meant strictly for high-volume quality policing.
Side by side
More dots mean more of that dimension. Read across each row to see how the three futures differ.
| Dimension | OptimisticKorchi | Trade-offBeger | PessimisticAgten |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI autonomy on routine reads | |||
| Radiologist clinical authority | |||
| Direct patient contact | |||
| Interventional and procedural work | |||
| AI governance and oversight load | |||
| Radiologist headcount | |||
| Career security | |||
| Back a view |
Highlighted column = the version your answers matched.
All three columns are read from the authors' full texts. Agten's version describes a tiered profession rather than one job, so his column shows the typical radiologist's experience averaged across the three tiers. The tiers themselves are set out in full in his version above.